After more than six decades of global development work, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has officially ceased independent operations on July 1, 2025. The agency has now been fully absorbed into the U.S. State Department, marking the culmination of a broader initiative aimed at streamlining government under the “America First” agenda.
What Happened?
-
Transfer to State Department: The agency’s remaining programs—roughly 17% of its original portfolio—are being transitioned to State Department control. Over 83% of USAID contracts (about 5,200 out of 6,200) were terminated earlier this year during an accelerated review process led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Department of Government Efficiency.
-
Rationale: The Trump administration, backed by Elon Musk’s efficiency team, contended that USAID had grown bloated, inefficient, and had strayed from its core mission. Secretary Rubio argued the reorganization would result in a leaner, more accountable approach to foreign assistance.
-
Legal and Political Pushback: Critics alleged that this sweeping reorganization may conflict with congressional authority over foreign aid. A federal judge recently noted that the broad suspension of funding appeared disproportionate and lacked sufficient factual grounding.
Why It Matters
-
Cutting Billions in Global Aid
USAID once managed roughly $40 billion annually and employed over 10,000 staff. It was central to U.S. diplomacy and had guided major global health programs like PEPFAR, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief . -
Humanitarian Fallout
The abrupt aid suspension has triggered cascading consequences from halted HIV/AIDS treatment and cancelled rape-survivor support kits in eastern Congo, to sharpened funding gaps in countries like Sudan, Haiti, and South Africa. -
Health and Mortality Concerns
A 2025 Lancet report warned that halting USAID-funded health initiatives could contribute to up to 14 million excess deaths by 2030 in low- and middle-income nations. -
U.S. Credibility at Stake
The dismantling of USAID has drawn stiff criticism from prominent figures across the U.S. political spectrum including Barack Obama, George W. Bush, and humanitarian experts—who argue the move undermines America’s global standing and moral influence.
What Comes Next?
-
Aid Remains, But Shrinks: Some programs considered “high priority” may continue under the State Department. However, clarity is lacking on which initiatives will survive, and many vulnerable communities may remain unsupported.
-
Shifting to Partnership Models: With major donors pulling back, Africa and other recipient regions may need to pivot towards sustainable partnerships—led by trade, diaspora investment, and regional funding mechanisms .
-
Geopolitical Tug of War: Analysts warn that reduced U.S. involvement creates space for global competitors like China to fill the development vacuum. Meanwhile, lawsuits and legislative scrutiny continue over whether the closure was legally justified.
USAID’s dissolution marks a pivotal shift in global aid architecture—one that challenges U.S. soft power and tests the resilience of international development networks. As traditional assistance models falter, the world watches to see whether the U.S. can reconstruct a more efficient but equally impactful system—or if rival powers will step into the void.